Summary:
Modern automotive user interface (UI) design faces growing challenges as vehicles become more digitally integrated. While touchscreens and digital controls are cheaper and more versatile than traditional buttons, they often introduce usability and safety issues, particularly at highway speeds. Many automakers prioritize cost-saving and aesthetics over functionality, leading to cluttered, complex, and inconsistent user experiences.
A key mistake is consolidating too many functions onto a single screen. Despite the rise of large, dashboard-spanning displays in luxury vehicles, smaller cars often use just one central screen for everything—from climate control to speed display. The Mini Cooper exemplifies this, featuring a round screen that reduces usable space and forces cramped menus and curved sliders, making navigation confusing and distracting.
The Volvo EX30 also eliminates physical buttons and traditional gauge clusters, relying entirely on a vertically oriented touchscreen. Even with its larger size, the interface demands so much attention that Volvo’s own driver-monitoring system frequently issues alerts for distracted driving while users interact with the display. In one dangerous instance, a driver had to navigate deep into menus to activate fog lights during a blizzard, underscoring the real-world risks of poor UI design.
Additionally, inconsistency in screen behavior adds to driver confusion. Mazda’s infotainment system, for example, may or may not support touch depending on the vehicle, screen size, or if Apple CarPlay or Android Auto is active. Touch input might even be disabled while driving, contradicting the purpose of mobile integration and frustrating users.
Ultimately, these design flaws stem from attempts to reduce costs or push minimalist aesthetics without fully considering driver needs or safety. Automakers continue to invest in advanced safety tech, yet neglect intuitive, consistent interfaces—ironically compromising the very safety they aim to enhance.
Driving
Read the Full Article